Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This Maple Workbook explores a new topic in linear algebra, which is called "Bohemian Matrices". The topic is accessible to people who have had even just one linear algebra course, or have arrived at the point in their course where they have touched "eigenvalues". We use only the concepts of characteristic polynomial and eigenvalue. Even so, we will see some open questions, things that no-one knows for sure; even better, this is quite an exciting new area and we haven't even finished asking the easy questions yet! So it is possible that the reader will have found something new by the time they have finished going through this workbook. Reading this workbook is not like reading a paper: you will want to execute the code, and change things, and try alternatives. You will want to read the code, as well. I have tried to make it self-explanatory.
 We will begin with some pictures, and then proceed to show how to make such pictures using Maple (or, indeed, many other computational tools). Then we start asking questions about the pictures, and about other things.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it