Multi-level multi-modality (PET and CT) fusion radiomics: prognostic modeling for non-small cell lung carcinoma
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
F-FDG PET and CT images using feature- and image-level fusions, toward improved prognosis for non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients. Two independent cohorts of NSCLC patients from two institutions (87 and 95 patients) were cycled as training and testing datasets. Fusion approaches were applied at two levels, namely feature- and image-levels. For feature-level fusion, radiomic features were extracted individually from CT and PET images and concatenated. Alternatively, radiomic features extracted separately from CT and PET images were averaged. For image-level fusion, wavelet fusion was utilized and tuned with two parameters, namely CT weight and Wavelet Band Pass Filtering Ratio. Clinical and combined clinical + radiomic models were developed. Gray level discretization was performed at 3 different levels (16, 32 and 64) and 225 radiomics features were extracted. Overall survival (OS) was considered as the endpoint. For feature reduction, correlated (redundant) features were excluded using Spearman's correlation, and best combination of top ten features with highest concordance-indices (via univariate Cox model) were selected in each model for further multivariate Cox model. Moreover, prognostic score's median, obtained from the training cohort, was used intact in the testing cohort as a threshold to classify patients into low- versus high-risk groups, and log-rank test was applied to assess differences between the Kaplan-Meier curves. Overall, while models based on feature-level fusion strategy showed limited superiority over single-modalities, image-level fusion strategy significantly outperformed both single-modality and feature-level fusion strategies. As such, the clinical model (C-index = 0.656) outperformed all models from single-modality and feature-level strategies, but was outperformed by certain models from image-level fusion strategy. Our findings indicated that image-level fusion multi-modality radiomics models outperformed single-modality, feature-level fusion, and clinical models for OS prediction of NSCLC patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it