ASPHYXIA NEONATORUM;
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Severe hypoxic ischemic organ damage is caused by asphyxia innewborns which can follow fatal outcomes or severe life-long pathologies like renal insufficiency.We wanted to note the frequency of renal derangement in neonates having asphyxia neonatoumin this study. Setting & Period: Department of Pediatrics, Bahawal Victoria Hospital (BVH),Bahawalpur, from 1st January 2017 to 31st June 2017. Materials & Methods: Two hundredand sixty four neonates of both genders with birth asphyxia were included in the study. Mainoutcome was renal derangement in asphyxia neonatorum. Results: Mean weight was 2.54kg with standard deviation 0.50 kg and having mean APGAR score 4.43 with SD 1.66. 0It wasnoted that 189 (71.6%) neonates had Renal derangement in which 109 (57.7%) were males and80 (42.3%) were females with mean of weight was 2.53kg, having mean APGAR score 4.44.Conclusion: Renal derangement is quite common in neonates with birth asphyxia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".