Paste backfill thermal contraction: Red Lake operations case study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the earliest attempts at field measurement within hydraulically placed cemented backfill occurred over 20 years ago. Recently, Thompson et al. (2014a) published their findings on capturing thermal expansion within cemented paste backfill (CPB) and cemented hydraulic backfill (CHB). They discovered that the total earth pressure within the CPB following placement is likely to increase at a rate of 30 kPa/°C (i.e. for an 11°C temperature increase). However, Thompson and his co-authors' research did not elaborate on the subsequent effects of thermal dissipation (or thermal contraction) in backfill. A comprehensive literature study concluded with no clear evidence of thermal dissipation phenomenon and its effects in backfill. It is hypothesised by the authors that if thermal expansion can occur, then thermal dissipation or contraction is also likely to occur. Red Lake operation (RLO) of Evolution Mining conducted a field program to capture the characteristics of the CPB during a transition from a plug–cure–main pour strategy to a more aggressive pour strategy (i.e. continuous pour operation). During this investigation, strong evidence of thermal contraction was observed in three of the four instrumented stopes. This paper presents detailed findings of two of the instrumented stopes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".