MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3201581532 · doi:10.3749/canmin.2000016

Platinum and gold placer from Tugidak Island, Alaska: Platinum-group minerals and their inclusions, gold, and chromite mineralogy

2021· article· en· W3201581532 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Harvey E. Belkin, A.E. Grosz

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlatinum groupGeologyPlacer miningChromiteMineralPlatinumGeochemistryElectron microprobeMineralogySilicateMetallurgyMaterials scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Black sand beach placers from Kodiak, Sitkinak, and Tugidak Islands, Alaska, have been mined intermittently for gold and minor platinum-group alloys for more than 100 years. High-grade platinum-rich magnetic separate and accompanying black sand from the southern beach placer of Tugidak Island were studied using electron microprobe WDS and scanning electron microscope EDS; mineral classification and identification were based on these techniques. The major platinum mineral is isoferroplatinum, followed by minor tetraferroplatinum and tulameenite, and rare ferronickelplatinum. Two types of alteration were identified in about 3–4% of the alloy grains: rim formation involving Pt loss and increased Fe, Ni, and/or Cu, and fracturing and vein filling by Cu-rich alloy. Ruthenium-Ir-Os-Pt alloys occur as inclusions and veins as well as form part of composite grains. Ten percent of the alloy grains contain a large variety of platinum-group minerals (PGM). Inclusions of cuprorhodsite, malanite, cuproiridsite, laurite, erlichmanite, cooperite, braggite, bowieite, kashinite, miassite, hollingworthite, irarsite, sperrylite, stillwaterite, genkinite, stibiopalladinite, keithconnite, zvyagintsevite, and probable palladodymite and vincentite were identified. Two unidentified inclusion phases also occur. Most of the PGM inclusions are primary and were trapped by a growing crystal from a melt; some inclusions exhibit textures that suggest trapping of an As,Te,S-rich immiscible melt. Secondary inclusions and evidence of deformation were observed in a few alloy grains. Associated with PGM inclusions or as separate inclusions are various base-metal sulfides. Two silicate-melt inclusions in one isoferroplatinum grain have an andesite–shoshonite composition. Minor gold and Ag-rich gold in the high-grade magnetic separate contain magnetite, pyrrhotite, and chromite inclusions. The gold composition suggests that their sources are the numerous quartz veins and apophyses related to granitoids on Kodiak Island. The composition of the placer chromite is similar to chromite from the Border Ranges mélange fault system and suggests that the Uyak Complex ultramafic and mafic rocks are part of a supra-subduction-zone ophiolite and are the source of the platinum-group minerals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207