MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3201634655 · doi:10.1109/tccn.2021.3114147

Improving Energy Efficiency and QoS of LPWANs for IoT Using Q-Learning Based Data Routing

2021· article· en· W3201634655 on OpenAlexaff
Om Jee Pandey, Tankala Yuvaraj, Joseph K. Paul, Ha H. Nguyen, Karthikay Gundepudi, Mahendra K. Shukla

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIoT Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkScalabilityTestbedQuality of serviceWireless sensor networkEfficient energy useData transmissionEnergy consumptionDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) demands large scale connectivity among smart IoT devices over a vast geographical area. However, limited radio range and lack of scalability of conventional wireless sensor networks do not allow a wide area connectivity among IoT devices. To address these challenges, Low-Power Wide-Area Networks (LPWANs) are emerging to provide long-range communication capability with low-power consumption of the end devices. Nevertheless, given the demand in delivering an increasingly large volume of data generated by IoT devices, the direct data transmission model is not suitable due to its poor network lifetime. Therefore, in this work, a multi-hop data routing method is proposed for LPWANs. Since multi-hop data transmission faces several challenges such as increased data latency, higher interference, and reduced data throughput (i.e., poor bandwidth utilization), we propose a reinforcement learning method to address those challenges. The proposed method updates the Q-matrix of the network at varying discrete time instants and selects relay devices in such a way that maximizes the cumulative reward value between selected device-gateway pairs. The applicability and effectiveness of the proposed method are illustrated over both simulated LPWAN testbed and real field data sets. The obtained results clearly demonstrate the improved network performance in terms of energy efficiency and QoS of the proposed method as compared to various existing methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and NetworkingSame topicIoT Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207