MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

THE EFFECT OF COMMUNICATION AND WORK DISCIPLINE ON PERFORMANCE OF EMPLOYEES OF THE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AGENCY (BAPPEDA) OF WAY KANAN DISTRICT

2021· article· en· W3201711426 on OpenAlex
Dharmawan, Yosi Yulia

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSaburai International Journal of Social Sciences and Development · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEmployee Performance and Management
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgency (philosophy)Work (physics)ManagementOperations managementRegional scienceSociologyEngineeringEconomicsSocial scienceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of communication on employee performance and the effect of work discipline on employees and want to know the effect of communication and work discipline together on the performance of the Regional Development Planning Agency of Way Kanan Regency. The data collection technique was carried out by distributing questionnaires/questionnaires to 35 respondents using the SPSS program. The study results show the following: that Communication (X1) affects the performance of employees of the Regional Development Planning Agency of Way Kanan Regency by 82.20% while Work Discipline (X2) affects employee performance by 84.30%. Furthermore, Communication (X1) and Work Discipline (X2) together affect the Performance of the Regional Development Planning Agency of Way Kanan Regency employees by 86.90%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.495

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it