Hydrothermal Aging and Bonding Properties of a New Room Temperature Cured Structural Adhesive in Building Components
Bibliographic record
Abstract
his paper firstly explores the hydrothermal aging performance of a new room temperature cured structural adhesive at four different levels of relative humidity through dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). The results show that the strengthening effect of post-curing was stronger than weakening effect of humidity. Then, the Arrhenius equation was introduced to calculate the ratio of the apparent activation energy of this adhesive at the glass transition temperature before and after hydrothermal aging. The little change of the ratio suggests that the adhesive boasts a strong resistance to hydrothermal aging. In addition, the adhesive was tested on concrete structures at room temperature to observe its repairing effect of concrete cracks. The observations reveal that the compressive strength of the cracked concrete block repaired by the adhesive was as high as 90.5% of that of the intact concrete block. Furthermore, the adhesive was used to bond rebars to concrete under three different constant tensile speeds. The results demonstrate that the bonding effect was better under slow constant loading.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".