MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3201726107 · doi:10.18280/ts.380409

Pipeline of Optimization Techniques for Multi-Level Thresholding in Medical Image Compression Using 2D Histogram

2021· article· en· W3201726107 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vimala Kumari Gollu, Ganta Usha Sravani, Mandru Sunil Prakash

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Enhancement Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThresholdingHistogramComputer sciencePeak signal-to-noise ratioArtificial intelligenceParticle swarm optimizationImage compressionPattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionImage (mathematics)AlgorithmImage processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent times, medical scan images are crucial for accurate diagnosis by medical professionals. Due to the increasing size of the medical images, transfer and storage of images require huge bandwidth and storage space, and hence needs compression. In this paper, multilevel thresholding using 2-D histogram is proposed for compressing the images. In the proposed work, hybridization of optimization techniques viz., Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Symbiotic Organisms Search (SOS) is used to optimize the multilevel thresholding process by assuming the Renyi entropy as an objective function. Meaningful clusters are possible with optimal threshold values, which lead to better image compression. For performance evaluation, the proposed work has been examined on six Magnetic Resonance (MR) images of brain and compared with individual optimization techniques as well as with 1-D histogram. Recent study reveals that peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) fail in measuring the visual quality of reconstructed image because of mismatch with the objective mean opinion scores (MOS). So, we incorporate weighted PSNR (WPSNR) and visual PSNR (VPSNR) as performance measuring parameters of the proposed method. Experimental results reveal that hGAPSO-SOS method can be accurately and efficiently used in problem of multilevel thresholding for image compression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicImage Enhancement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207