Influence on crystal nucleation of an order-disorder transition among the subcritical clusters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies of nucleation generally focus on the properties of the critical cluster, but the presence of defects within the crystal lattice means that the population of nuclei necessarily evolve through a distribution of precritical clusters with varying degrees of structural disorder on their way to forming a growing stable crystal. To investigate the role precritical clusters play in nucleation, we develop a simple thermodynamic model for crystal nucleation in terms of cluster size and the degree of cluster order that allows us to alter the work of forming the precritical clusters without affecting the properties of the critical cluster. The steady state and transient nucleation behavior of the system are then studied numerically, for different microscopic ordering kinetics. We find that the model exhibits a generic order-disorder transition in the precritical clusters. Independent of the types of ordering kinetics, increasing the accessibility of disordered precritical clusters decreases both the steady state nucleation rate and the nucleation lag time. Furthermore, the interplay between the free-energy surface and the microscopic ordering kinetics leads to three distinct nucleation pathways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".