MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3201876542 · doi:10.1109/tmech.2021.3112470

Discrete-Time Adaptive Neural Tracking Control and Its Experiments for Quadrotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Systems

2021· article· en· W3201876542 on OpenAlexaff
Xiuyu Zhang, Yue Wang, Guoqiang Zhu, Xinkai Chen, Chun‐Yi Su

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBacksteppingUnderactuationControl theory (sociology)Adaptive controlComputer scienceControl engineeringArtificial neural networkNonlinear systemScheme (mathematics)Tracking (education)Control (management)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the control of a quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle, the strong nonlinearities, coupling, and underactuated problem in both positioning and attitude systems of the quadrotor are major challenging issues to be solved. In this article, a discrete-time adaptive dynamic surface control (DSC) scheme for the quadrotor is proposed to obtain a satisfactory tracking performance. The nonlinearities and couplings are overcome by employing the designed robust adaptive DSC nonlinear control method. The underactuated problem is overcome by solving the designed adaptive neural control equations. Also, different from the continuous-time control scheme, the discrete-time control is more suitable for the computer and network control in practicable cases. Furthermore, the digital first-order low-pass filters are constructed to predict the future virtual control signal in the backstepping method, leading to the avoidance of the model transformation problem in the discrete-time backstepping method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE/ASME Transactions on MechatronicsSame topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207