MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3202024334 · doi:10.12030/j.cjee.202002032

Unconventional pollutant removal from a coal-fired ultra-low emission unit

2020· article· en· W3202024334 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chai Xiaokang, Guohe Huang, Xie Yulei, Wei Li

Bibliographic record

VenueHuanjing gongcheng xuebao · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlue-gas desulfurizationPollutantCoalChemistryCoal firedEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental scienceWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emission of unconventional pollutants from coal-fired power plants has not received enough attention. In order to fully characterize the removal characteristics of unconventional pollutants from coal-fired power plants, the step removal characteristics of CPM, Hg, SO3, PAHs and other abnormal pollutant from a 1 000 MW coal-fired ultra-low emission unit were systematically studied by using FPM and CPM integration sampling system, Ontario method (OHM), controlling condensate method, HJ 646-2013 unit test method. The results showed that at 100% and 75% loadings, the removal efficiencies of CPM were 87.15% and 92.20% by the low-low-temperature electric dust removal system, respectively, and wet desulfurization efficiencies were 49.65% and 45.55%, respectively. At different loadings, FPM emission concentrations were 3.6 and 4.4 mg·m−3, respectively, but CPM emission concentrations were 14.2 and 15.3 mg·m−3, the latter ones were much higher than the former ones. The Hg removal efficiency of low-low-temperature electric dust removal system was 64.81%, and the Hg removal efficiency of the whole system was 75.5%. Hgp was totally removed, and the remaining ones were Hg0 and Hg2+ being hard to remove, their removal efficiencies were 63.01% and 64.29%, respectively. The emission concentrations of Hg0 and Hg2+ were 5.4 μg·m−3 and 0.5 μg·m−3, respectively. The conversion rate of SO2 oxidized to SO3 by SCR denitration catalyst was about 0.7%. The low-low-temperature electric dust removal system could remove 88.7% SO3 in the gaseous state, the wet desulfurization could remove 29.63% SO3, the final SO3 emission concentration was 1.9 mg·m−3. The removal efficiency of 16 kinds of PAHs from the whole system reached 94.25%, of which the removal efficiencies of gas and solid phase PAHs were 91.61% and 99.27%, respectively, their corresponding emission concentrations were 2.39 and 0.11 μg·m−3, respectively. The existing ultra-low emission equipment had different levels of collaborative removal effect of unconventional pollutants, the emission concentrations of CPM, Hg, SO3 and PAHs of the unit at full loading were 14.2 mg·m−3, 5.9 μg·m−3, 1.9 mg·m−3 and 2.5 μg·m−3, respectively. The Hg emission concentration meets the standard of 30 μg·m−3 in Emission Standard for air pollutants from thermal power plants, and the national compulsory emission standard for the emission concentrations of CPM, Hg, SO3 and PAH have not yet settled. This study can provide a reference for the control of unconventional pollutants in coal-fired power plants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.615
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuanjing gongcheng xuebaoSame topicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic PrecipitationFrench-language works237,207