MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3202039410 · doi:10.1101/2021.10.03.462950

Natural influent bioaugmentation of activated sludge water resource recovery systems: implications for low temperature nitrification and heterotrophic population structures

2021· preprint· en· W3202039410 on OpenAlexaff
Shameem Jauffur, Zeinab Bakhshi, Dominic Frigon

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNitrificationNitrospiraNitrifying bacteriaActivated sludgeBioaugmentationSequencing batch reactorWastewaterNitrobacterPulp and paper industrySewage treatmentPopulationChemistryEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental chemistryBiologyEnvironmental scienceBacteriaMicroorganismNitrogen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This work aimed at demonstrating the natural bioaugmentation of biological activated sludge systems with nitrifying biomass from influent wastewater in lab-scale reactors. Three sequencing batch reactors (SBR) were fed with sterile synthetic wastewater. While nitrification was complete at a temperature of 8 °C and a SRT of 20 days, it failed when the temperature was lowered to 5 °C, and the SRT decreased to 7 days. In the test period, the sterile synthetic wastewater fed to the Test Reactor was supplemented by influent solids harvested at a full-scale treatment facility at a total suspended solids concentration of 100 mg/L, which corresponded to approximately 5 mg-COD/L of nitrifying biomass. Upon this addition, nitrification was restores. Subsequent halting the supply of influent solids to the Test Reactor led a rapid failure of nitrification and washout of nitrifiers from the SBR. Reproducibility was demonstrated by switching the feed composition between the Test and Negative control reactors. PCR-based amplicon sequencing analyses targeting the amoA , and nxrB genes of the Nitrospira genus have shown that the influent wastewater governed the structure and composition of the activated sludge nitrifying populations. The most abundant ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and Nitrospira -related nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) in the influent seeds occurred as the most dominant ones in the activated sludge. This pattern was observed even when the influent seeds varied over time. The heterotrophic populations were less affected by the influent seeds with the activated sludge and raw sewage showing distinct microbial populations based on principal coordinate analysis (PCoA). However, the immigrant populations appeared to modulate the structure of the activated sludge heterotrophic communities to some extent. These findings provide concrete evidence of the presence of active nitrifiers in raw wastewater capable of supporting nitrification in an otherwise non-conducive environment. This may have important implications on process design, operation and optimization of wastewater treatment systems. Highlights Lab-scale reactors fed sterile synthetic wastewater at low temperatures and SRTs. Nitrification failed when conditions were adjusted to 5 °C and a SRT of 7 days. Nitrification restored by addition of real wastewater influent solids. Nitrifiers in solids from sewers naturally bioaugment activated sludge systems. Activated sludge models should consider the immigration of nitrifiers with influent. Graphical abstract

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal→French-language works237,207→