MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3202076557 · doi:10.3847/psj/ac1f9b

Size and Shape of (11351) Leucus from Five Occultations

2021· article· en· W3202076557 on OpenAlex
M. W. Buie, Brian A. Keeney, Ryder Strauss, T. Blank, John G. Moore, Simon B. Porter, L. H. Wasserman, R. Weryk, Harold F. Levison, C. B. Olkin, Rodrigo Leiva, J. Bardecker, Michael E. Brown, Lilah B Brown, Michael P. Collins, Hugh M. Davidson, David Dunham, J. B. Dunham, John A. Eaccarino, T. Finley, Lindsay Fuller, Maria Lúcia Andrade Garcia, T. George, Kai Getrost, Megan T. Gialluca, Rima Givot, David Gupton, W. Hanna, C. W. Hergenrother, Y. Salcedo Hernandez, Bryan Hill, P. C. Hinton, Timothy R. Holt, R. R. Howell, J. L. Jewell, Roxanne L. Kamin, Joshua A. Kammer, Theodore Kareta, Gregory J. Kayl, John M. Keller, David A. Kenyon, Scott R. Kester, John Kidd, Tod R. Lauer, C. W. S. Leung, Zoey R. Lorusso, Christopher B. Lundgren, L. O. Magaña, Paul D. Maley, Franck Marchis, R. L. Marcialis, Andrew E. McCandless, Delsie McCrystal, A. M. McGraw, Kelly E. Miller, B. E. A. Mueller, John W. Noonan, Aart M. Olsen, Alexander Patton, Daniel O’Conner Peluso, Michael J. Person, J. Rigby, Alex D. Rolfsmeier, Julien Salmon, Joseph Samaniego, R. P. Sawyer, David M. Schulz, Michael F. Skrutskie, Rose J. C. Smith, J. R. Spencer, Alessondra Springmann, Dale Stanbridge, Timothy J. Stoffel, Peter Tamblyn, Bryan Tobias, A. Verbiscer, Michael P. von Schalscha, Holly Werts, Qicheng Zhang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Planetary Science Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLos Alamos National LaboratoryPlanetary Science DivisionScience Mission DirectorateSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemSpace Telescope Science InstituteQueen's UniversityUniversity of EdinburghJohns Hopkins UniversityMcKnight FoundationNational Central UniversityNuclear Safety and Security CommissionGordon and Betty Moore FoundationQueen's University BelfastNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationDurham UniversitySmithsonian InstitutionNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAstrometryPhysicsLine-of-sightGeodesyAstronomyObject (grammar)Epoch (astronomy)Differential (mechanical device)AstrophysicsStarsGeologyGeometryArtificial intelligenceMathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present observations of five stellar occultations for (11351) Leucus and reports from two efforts on (21900) Orus. Both objects are prime mission candidate targets for the Lucy Discovery mission. Combined results for Leucus indicate a very dark surface with p V = 0.037 ± 0.001, which is derived from the average of the multichord occultations. Our estimate of the triaxial ellipsoidal shape is for axial diameters of 63.8 × 36.6 × 29.6 km assuming that the spin pole is normal to the line of sight. The actual shape of the object is only roughly elliptical in profile at each epoch. Significant topography is seen with horizontal scales up to 30 km and vertical scales up to 5 km. The most significant feature is a large depression on the southern end of the object as seen from a terrestrial viewpoint. For this work we developed a method to correct for differential refraction, accounting for the difference in color between the target object and the reference stars for astrometry derived from ground-based images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it