27 Machine Learning Algorithms Based on Haplotype Libraries for Classification of Stillbirth Susceptibility in Holstein Cows
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Reduced fertility is one of the main causes of economic losses in dairy farms. The cost of a stillbirth is estimated in US$ 938 per case in Holstein herds. Machine learning (ML) is gaining popularity in the livestock sector as a mean to identify hidden patterns and due to its potential to address dimensionality problems. Here we investigate the application of ML algorithms for the prediction of cows with higher stillbirth susceptibility in two scenarios: cows with >25% and >33.33% of stillbirths among birth records. These thresholds correspond to percentiles 75 (still_75) and 90 (still_90), respectively. A total of 10,570 cows and 50,541 birth records were collected to perform a haplotype-based genome-wide association study. Five-hundred significant pseudo single nucleotide polymorphisms (pseudo-SNPs) (False-Discovery Rate< 0.05) were used as input features of ML-based predictions to determine if the cow is in the top-75 and top-90 percentiles. Table 1 shows the classification performance of the investigated ML and linear models. The ML models outperformed linear models for both thresholds. In general, still_75 showed higher F1 values compared to still_90, suggesting a lower misclassification ratio when a less stringent threshold is used. We observe that accuracy of the models in our study is higher when compared to ML-based prediction accuracies in other breeds, e.g. compared to the accuracies of 0.46 and 0.67 that were achieved using SNPs for body weight in Brahman and fertility traits in Nellore, respectively. Xgboost algorithm shows the highest balanced accuracy (BA; 0.625), F1-score (0.588) and area under the curve (AUC; 0.688), suggesting that xgboost can achieve the highest predictive performance and the lowest difference in misclassification ratio between classes. The ML applied over haplotype libraries is an interesting approach for the detection of animals with higher susceptibility to stillbirths due to highest predictive accuracy and relatively lower misclassification ratio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".