MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3202091123 · doi:10.1161/hyp.70.suppl_1.p122

Abstract P122: Plasma Circulating microRNAs as Potential Biomarkers in Chronic Kidney Disease

2017· article· en· W3202091123 on OpenAlexaff
Olga Berillo, Ku-Geng Huo, Júlio C Fraulob-Aquino, Chantal Richer, Asia Rehman, Marie Briet, Pierre Boutouyrie, Mark L. Lipman, Daniel Sinnett, Pierre Paradis, Ernesto L. Schiffrin

Bibliographic record

VenueHypertension · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKidney diseaseMedicineBlood pressureInternal medicinemicroRNADiseaseRenal functionStage (stratigraphy)EpidemiologyRNABioinformaticsEndocrinologyOncologyBiologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health burden with a worldwide prevalence of 13.4% for stage 5 and 10.6% for stage 3-5. There is an epidemiological association between hypertension (HTN) and CKD. The prevalence of high blood pressure (BP) has been reported to be over 85% in stage 3 and over 90% in stage 4-5 CKD patients. Circulating cell-free small non-coding RNAs called microRNA (miRNA) have been shown to associate with different pathologies including cancer and cardiovascular disease, and accordingly possesses potential to serve as biomarkers with clinical application. We aimed to identify differentially expressed (DE) miRNAs that may be related to CKD. Methods and Results: Normotensive, HTN (systolic BP > 135 mmHg or diastolic BP of 85-115 mmHg with BPtru) and CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60mL/min/m 2 ) subjects (n=15-16 per group) were studied. Platelet-free plasma was isolated by a 2-step centrifugation (1000xg followed by 10,000xg) from 6 ml total blood. Plasma miRNAs were extracted using the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit. The quantity and quality of RNA were assessed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. cDNA libraries were prepared using the TruSeq Small RNA Library Prep Kit, and sequenced with the HiSeq 2500 platform. FastQC was used for quality control. Sequences were mapped by STAR to the hg38 genome and annotated by miRDeep2. DE miRNAs were identified using EdgeR, which found 6 up-regulated and 3 down-regulated miRNAs uniquely associated with the HTN group, 2 up-regulated and 12 down-regulated miRNAs uniquely associated with the CKD group and 3 down-regulated miRNAs in both groups ( P <0.01 & q<0.1). Two down-regulated miRNAs in the HTN group, miR-26a-5p (r=-0.33, P <0.05) and miR-151a-5p (r=-0.33, P <0.05), were correlated with SBP. One up-regulated miRNA in CKD group, let-7g-5p (r=0.31, P <0.05), was correlated with eGFR. Conclusions and Perspectives: DE platelet-free plasma miRNAs were identified in HTN and CKD patients. Some miRNAs may have the potential to serve as biomarkers in CKD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHypertensionSame topicMicroRNA in disease regulationFrench-language works237,207