MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3202190095 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.134102

Evidence for mechanical softening-hardening dual anomaly in transition metals from shock-compressed vanadium

2021· article· en· W3202190095 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hao Wang, Jun Li, Xianming Zhou, Ye Tan, Yin Yu, Chunhao Dai, Ke Jin, Qiang Wu, Qi Jing, Xiang-Rong Chen, Xiaozhen Yan, Yi X. Wang, Hua-Yun Geng

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience Challenge ProjectNSAF Joint FundNatural Science Foundation of Jiangxi ProvinceChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationTohoku UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanadian Association of Emergency Physicians
KeywordsSofteningMaterials scienceVanadiumHardening (computing)Phase transitionCompression (physics)Composite materialThermodynamicsFlow stressBulk modulusMechanicsCondensed matter physicsMetallurgyStrain ratePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solids usually become harder and tougher under compression and turn softer at elevated temperature. Recently, the compression-induced softening and heating-induced hardening dual anomaly was predicted in group VB elements such as vanadium. Here, the evidence for this counterintuitive phenomenon is reported. By using accurate high-temperature, high-pressure (HP) sound velocities measured at Hugoniot states generated by shockwaves, together with first-principles calculations, we observe not only the prominent compression-induced sound velocity reduction but also strong heating-induced sound velocity enhancement in shocked vanadium. The former corresponds to the softening in the shear modulus by compression, whereas the latter reflects the reverse hardening by heat. These experiments also unveil another anomaly in Young's modulus. Based on the experimental and theoretical data, we infer that vanadium might transition from body-centered cubic into two different rhombohedral phases at \ensuremath{\sim}79 and 116 GPa along the Hugoniot, respectively, which implies a dramatic difference in static and dynamic loading, as well as the significance of deviatoric stress and rate-relevant effects in HP phase transition dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207