EvoPose2D: Pushing the Boundaries of 2D Human Pose Estimation Using Accelerated Neuroevolution With Weight Transfer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neural architecture search has proven to be highly effective in the design of efficient convolutional neural networks that are better suited for mobile deployment than hand-designed networks. Hypothesizing that neural architecture search holds great potential for human pose estimation, we explore the application of neuroevolution, a form of neural architecture search inspired by biological evolution, in the design of 2D human pose networks for the first time. Additionally, we propose a new weight transfer scheme that enables us to accelerate neuroevolution in a flexible manner. Our method produces network designs that are more efficient and more accurate than state-of-the-art hand-designed networks. In fact, the generated networks process images at higher resolutions using less computation than previous hand-designed networks at lower resolutions, allowing us to push the boundaries of 2D human pose estimation. Our base network designed via neuroevolution, which we refer to as EvoPose2D-S, achieves comparable accuracy to SimpleBaseline while being 50% faster and 12.7x smaller in terms of file size. Our largest network, EvoPose2D-L, achieves new state-of-the-art accuracy on the Microsoft COCO Keypoints benchmark, is 4.3x smaller than its nearest competitor, and has similar inference speed. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/wmcnally/evopose2d.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".