MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3202223382 · doi:10.1111/jne.13048

Mechanism and function of phasic firing in vasopressin‐releasing magnocellular neurosecretory cells

2021· review· en· W3202223382 on OpenAlexafffund
Zahra S. Thirouin, Charles W. Bourque

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroendocrinology · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsVasopressinInternal medicineEndocrinologyMechanism (biology)Function (biology)OxytocinMagnocellular cellNeuroscienceBiologyCell biologyMedicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Magnocellular neurosecretory cells that release vasopressin (MNC VP ) from axon terminals in the neurohypophysis display a unique pattern of action potential firing termed phasic firing. Under basal conditions, only a small proportion of MNC VP display spontaneous phasic firing. However, acute and chronic conditions that stimulate vasopressin release, such as hemorrhage and dehydration, greatly enhance the number of MNC VP that fire phasically. Phasic firing optimizes VP neurosecretion at axon terminals by allowing action potential broadening to promote calcium‐dependent frequency‐facilitation, at the same time as preventing the secretory fatigue caused by spike inactivation that occurs during prolonged continuous stimulation. This review provides an update on our mechanistic understanding of these processes and highlights important gaps in our knowledge that must be addressed in future experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeuroendocrinologySame topicNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorFrench-language works237,207