A Tale of Two Radiation Belts: The Energy‐Dependence of Self‐Limiting Electron Space Radiation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The flux of energetic electrons in the terrestrial Van Allen Belts varies by orders of magnitude during a magnetic storm. Here, we show how the dynamics of these electrons are clearly separated by energy into two distinct populations which are governed by different storm time behavior. We reveal how self‐limiting processes, described theoretically by Kennel and Petschek (1966), https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ071i001p00001 , govern the energy‐dependent dynamics of the electrons. For terrestrial magnetic storms, accelerated electrons with energies below 850 keV quickly reach a maximum energy‐dependent differential flux level which is almost the same in every storm. Higher energy electrons typically do not reach a limiting flux and instead are governed by the differential impacts of competing acceleration and loss mechanisms. In general, electron fluxes saturate at the Kennel‐Petschek limit first at lower energies, impacting higher energies later in the storm. For the most intense storms, the maximum energy at which the fluxes are capped can also increase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".