Multiplicative Watermarking Method with the Visual Saliency Model Using Contourlet Transform
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have proposed an image adaptive watermarking method by using contourlet transform. Firstly, we have selected high-energy image blocks as the watermark embedding space through segmenting the original image into nonoverlapping blocks and designed a watermark embedded strength factor by taking advantage of the human visual saliency model. To achieve dynamic adjustability of the multiplicative watermark embedding parameter, the relationship between watermark embedded strength factor and watermarked image quality is developed through experiments with the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index measure (SSIM), respectively. Secondly, to detect the watermark information, the generalized Gaussian distribution (GGD) has been utilized to model the contourlet coefficients. Furthermore, positions of the blocks selected, watermark embedding factor, and watermark size have been used as side information for watermark decoding. Finally, several experiments have been conducted on eight images, and the results prove the effectiveness of the proposed watermarking approach. Concretely, our watermarking method has good imperceptibility and strong robustness when against Gaussian noise, JPEG compression, scaling, rotation, median filtering, and Gaussian filtering attack.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".