MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3202337775 · doi:10.1063/5.0059652

A Database of Experimentally Derived and Estimated Octanol–Air Partition Ratios (<i>K</i>OA)

2021· article· en· W3202337775 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersEuropean Chemical Industry Council
KeywordsChemistryPartition coefficientPartition (number theory)Intermolecular forceOctanolRange (aeronautics)Environmental chemistryThermodynamicsMoleculeChromatographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Equilibrium partition coefficients or partition ratios are a fundamental concept in physical chemistry, with wide applications in environmental chemistry. While comprehensive data compilations for the octanol–water partition ratio and the Henry’s law constant have existed for many years, no comparable effort for the octanol–air partition ratio (KOA) exists. Considering the increasing use of KOA in understanding a chemical’s partitioning between a wide variety of organic phases (organic phases in atmospheric particles, plant foliage, polymeric sorbents, soil organic matter, animal tissues, etc.) and the gas phase, we have compiled all KOA values reported in the published literature. The dataset includes more than 2500 experimentally derived values and more than 10 000 estimated values for KOA, in total covering over 1500 distinct molecules. The range of measured log10 KOA values extends from −2 to 13. Many more measured values have been reported in the log10 KOA range from 2 to 5 and from 6 to 11 compared to the range from 5 to 6, which is due to the complementary applicability range of static and dynamic measurement techniques. The compilation also identifies measured data that are judged not reliable. KOA values for substances capable of undergoing strong hydrogen bonding derived from regressions with retention times on nonpolar gas chromatographic columns deviate strongly from values estimated by prediction techniques that account for such intermolecular interactions and should be considered suspect. It is hoped that the database will serve as a source for locating existing KOA data and for the calibration and evaluation of new KOA prediction techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it