Stoichiomorphic halogen-bonded cocrystals: a case study of 1,4-diiodotetrafluorobenzene and 3-nitropyridine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The concept of variable stoichiometry cocrystallization is explored in halogen-bonded systems. Three novel cocrystals of 1,4-diiodotetrafluorobenzene and 3-nitropyridine with molar ratios of 1:1, 2:1, and 1:2, respectively, are prepared by slow evaporation methods. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis reveals key differences between each of the nominally similar cocrystals. For instance, the 1:1 cocrystal crystallizes in the P21/n space group and features a single chemically and crystallographically unique halogen bond between iodine and the pyridyl nitrogen. The 2:1 cocrystal crystallizes in the [Formula: see text] space group and features a halogen bond between iodine and one of the nitro oxygens in addition to an iodine–nitrogen halogen bond. The 1:2 cocrystal crystallizes with a large unit cell (V = 9896 Å3) in the Cc space group and features 10 crystallographically distinct iodine-nitrogen halogen bonds. Powder X-ray diffraction experiments carried out on the 1:1 and 2:1 cocrystals confirm that gentle grinding does not alter the crystal forms. 1H → 13C and 19F → 13C cross-polarization magic angle spinning (CP/MAS) NMR experiments performed on powdered samples of the 1:1 and 2:1 cocrystals are used as spectral editing tools to select for either the halogen bond acceptor or donor, respectively. Carbon-13 chemical shifts in the cocrystals are shown to change only very subtly relative to pure solid 1,4-diiodotetrafluorobenzene, but the shift of the carbon directly bonded to iodine nevertheless increases, consistent with halogen bond formation (e.g., a shift of +1.6 ppm for the 2:1 cocrystal). This work contributes new examples to the field of variable stoichiometry cocrystal engineering with halogen bonds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".