Integration of Two-Dimensional Kernel Principal Component Analysis Plus Two-Dimensional Linear Discriminant Analysis with Convolutional Neural Network for Finger Vein Recognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High complexity and low recognition rate are two common problems with the current finger vein recognition methods. To solve these problems, this paper integrates two-dimensional kernel principal component analysis (K2DPCA) plus two-dimensional linear discriminant analysis (2DLDA) (K2DPCA+2DLDA) into convolutional neural network (CNN) to recognize finger veins. Considering the row and column correlations of the finger vein image matrix and the classes of finger vein images, the authors adopted K2DPCA and 2DLDA separately for dimensionality reduction and extraction of nonlinear features in row and column directions, producing a dimensionally reduced compressed image without row or column correlation. Taking the dimensionally reduced compressed image as the input, the CNN was introduced to learn higher-level features, making finger vein recognition more accurate and robust. The public dataset of Finger Vein USM (FV-USM) Database was adopted for experimental verification. The results show that the proposed approach effectively overcome the common defects of original image feature extraction: the insufficient feature description, and the redundancy of information. When the training reached 120 epochs, the model basically realized stable convergence, with the loss approaching zero and the recognition rate reaching 97.3%. Compared with two-directional two-dimensional Fisher principal component analysis ((2D)2FPCA), our strategy, which integrates K2DPCA+2DLDA with CNN, achieved a very high recognition rate of finger vein images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".