DenseResUNet: An Architecture to Assess Water-Stressed Sugarcane Crops from Sentinel-2 Satellite Imagery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A single most immense abiotic stress globally affecting the productivity of all the crops is water stress. Hence, timely and accurate detection of the water-stressed crops is a necessary task for high productivity. Agricultural crop production can be managed and enhanced by spatial and temporal evaluation of water-stressed crops through remotely sensed data. However, detecting water-stressed crops from remote sensing images is a challenging task as various factors impacting spectral bands, vegetation indices (VIs) at the canopy and landscape scales, as well as the fact that the water stress detection threshold is crop-specific, there has yet to be substantial agreement on their usage as a pre-visual signal of water stress. This research takes the benefits of freely available remote sensing data and convolutional neural networks to perform semantic segmentation of water-stressed sugarcane crops. Here an architecture ‘DenseResUNet’ is proposed for water-stressed sugarcane crops using segmentation based on encoder-decoder approach. The novelty of the proposed approach lies in the replacement of classical convolution operation in the UNet with the dense block. The layers of a dense block are residual modules with a dense connection. The proposed model achieved 61.91% mIoU, and 80.53% accuracy on segmenting the water-stressed sugarcane fields. This study compares the proposed architecture with the UNet, ResUNet, and DenseUNet models achieving mIoU of 32.20%, 58.34%, and 53.15%, respectively. The results of this study reveal that the model has the potential to identify water-stressed crops from remotely sensed data through deep learning techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".