Long-Term Outcome Following Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Late pulmonary valve replacement following repair of tetralogy of Fallot may become necessary in patients with chronic pulmonary insufficiency. There is limited information on the long-term outcome of these prostheses, which is the focus of this study. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot who underwent pulmonary valve replacement from 1990 to 2015 in our institution. We investigated imaging and clinical parameters including mortality and late adverse events (reintervention [surgical or transcatheter]), infective endocarditis, or arrhythmias requiring device implantation or ablation. Results: There were 69 patients divided into 3 groups: Carpentier-Edwards (n = 14), Contegra (n = 40), and pulmonary homograft (n = 15). The mean age at the time of pulmonary valve replacement was 21 ± 12 years. The mean follow-up was 8.5 ± 4.7 years. The mean preoperative and postoperative right ventricular end-diastolic volume index was 210 ± 42 and 120 ± 24 mL/m 2 , respectively. There were no mortalities. Late adverse events were observed in 23 (33%) patients: 15 (22%) reintervention (surgical or transcatheter), 11 (16%) endocarditis, and 11 (16%) arrhythmias. Overall, 1-, 5-, and 10-year freedom from surgical reintervention was 98.5%, 93.6%, and 79.3%, respectively. The Contegra group had significantly higher pulmonary valve gradients, a higher risk of developing late adverse events compared to Carpentier-Edwards ( P = .046) and pulmonary homograft ( P = .055) in multivariate analysis and increased risk for reintervention in the univariate analysis (hazard ratio: 3.4; 95% CI: 0.92-13; P value.066). Conclusion: Pulmonary valve replacement in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot has acceptable short- and intermediate-term outcomes. Contegra prosthesis had a higher risk of late adverse events with higher pulmonary valve gradients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".