Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Book Review: Resena del libro: Levy, P. (2007). Cibercultura. La cultura de la sociedad digital. [Informe al Consejo de Europa]. Prologo: Manuel Medina. Barcelona: Rubi; Mexico: Anthropos, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana. ISBN: 978-84-7658-808-6. Pierre Levy, Tunisian historian, and sociologist, member of the Academy of Sciences of Canada and director of the Research Chair in Collective Intelligence at the University of Ottawa, is world-renowned as a philosopher of cyberspace, a pioneer in the study and contributions on the development and implications of collective intelligence in society through a medium such as the Internet. He is also recognized as one of the greatest scholars of virtual culture in the world. Author, among others, of works such as: La machine univers (1987), The dynamic ideography (1991), The technologies of intelligence (1994), What is virtual? (1995), Cyberculture (1997) and Cyberdemocracy (2004). The text of Cyberculture corresponds to a report presented in 1997 before the Council of Europe on the cultural implications of digital communication and information technologies. Although some techniques and devices have lagged behind after ten years, however, their approaches to this fundamentally humanistic project (p.174) continue to be valid for contemporary culture connected to the Internet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it