MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3202625336 · doi:10.2196/32587

Investigating the Use of Digital Health Technology to Monitor COVID-19 and Its Effects: Protocol for an Observational Study (Covid Collab Study)

2021· article· en· W3202625336 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Callum Stewart, Yatharth Ranjan, Pauline Conde, Zulqarnain Rashid, Heet Sankesara, Xi Bai, Richard Dobson, Amos Folarin

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDigital Mental Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilChief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care DirectorateInnovative Medicines InitiativeNIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research CentrePublic Health AgencyEuropean Society of CardiologyEconomic and Social Research CouncilEuropean CommissionNational Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration South LondonDepartment of Health and Social CareHealth and Social Care Research and Development DivisionNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchKing's College LondonEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilUK Research and InnovationBritish Heart FoundationEuropean Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and AssociationsUniversity College LondonScottish GovernmentKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation TrustWellcome TrustSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
KeywordsTelemedicineMental healthData collectionPandemicmHealthWearable computerMobile phoneComputer scienceObservational studyInternet privacyPsychologyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Health careApplied psychologyMedicinePsychological interventionTelecommunicationsDiseasePsychiatryInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The ubiquity of mobile phones and increasing use of wearable fitness trackers offer a wide-ranging window into people's health and well-being. There are clear advantages in using remote monitoring technologies to gain an insight into health, particularly under the shadow of the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: Covid Collab is a crowdsourced study that was set up to investigate the feasibility of identifying, monitoring, and understanding the stratification of SARS-CoV-2 infection and recovery through remote monitoring technologies. Additionally, we will assess the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated social measures on people's behavior, physical health, and mental well-being. METHODS: Participants will remotely enroll in the study through the Mass Science app to donate historic and prospective mobile phone data, fitness tracking wearable data, and regular COVID-19-related and mental health-related survey data. The data collection period will cover a continuous period (ie, both before and after any reported infections), so that comparisons to a participant's own baseline can be made. We plan to carry out analyses in several areas, which will cover symptomatology; risk factors; the machine learning-based classification of illness; and trajectories of recovery, mental well-being, and activity. RESULTS: As of June 2021, there are over 17,000 participants-largely from the United Kingdom-and enrollment is ongoing. CONCLUSIONS: This paper introduces a crowdsourced study that will include remotely enrolled participants to record mobile health data throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. The data collected may help researchers investigate a variety of areas, including COVID-19 progression; mental well-being during the pandemic; and the adherence of remote, digitally enrolled participants. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/32587.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.033
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0330.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.804
GPT teacher head0.708
Teacher spread0.096 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research ProtocolsSame topicDigital Mental Health InterventionsFrench-language works237,207