MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Coexisting normal and intruder configurations in 32Mg

2021· preprint· en· W3202736322 on OpenAlexaff
N. Kitamura, K. Wimmer, A. Poves, Noritaka Shimizu, J. A. Tostevin, V. M. Bader, C. Bancroft, Douglas F. Barofsky, T. Baugher, D. Bazin, J. S. Berryman, V. Bildstein, A. Gade, N. Imai, T. Kröll, C. Langer, Jacob Lloyd, E. Lunderberg, F. Nowacki, G. Perdikakis, F. Recchia, Thomas W. Redpath, S. R. Paredes Saenz, D. Smalley, S. R. Stroberg, Y. Utsuno, D. Weißhaar, Arthur W. Westerberg

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Letters B · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryRIKENScience and Technology Facilities CouncilMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónNuclear PhysicsJoint Institute for Computational Fundamental ScienceJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceOffice of ScienceMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsObservableEikonal equationNucleusParity (physics)SHELL modelPhysicsAtomic physicsStatistical physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Situated in the so-called “island of inversion,” the nucleus 32Mg is considered as an archetypal example of the disappearance of magicity at N=20. We report on high statistics in-beam spectroscopy of 32Mg with a unique approach, in that two direct reaction probes with different sensitivities to the underlying nuclear structure are employed at the same time. More specifically, states in 32Mg were populated by knockout reactions starting from 33Mg and 34Si, lying inside and outside the island of inversion, respectively. The momentum distributions of the reaction residues and the cross sections leading to the individual final states were confronted with eikonal-based reaction calculations, yielding a significantly updated level scheme for 32Mg and spin-parity assignments. By fully exploiting observables obtained in this measurement, a variety of structures coexisting in 32Mg was unraveled. Comparisons with theoretical predictions based on shell-model overlaps allowed for clear discrimination between different structural models, revealing that the complete theoretical description of this key nucleus is yet to be achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics Letters BSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207