Family violence against children: approach to nursing through genogram and ecomapa / Violência familiar contra criança: abordagem de enfermagem através do genograma e ecomapa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objetivos: descrever a organização familiar frente ao caso de violência contra a criança e analisar através da utilização do genograma e ecomapao risco de familiares em situação de violência. Método: estudo descritivo, tipo estudo de caso realizado no setor pediátrico de um Hospital Municipal da Baixada Litorânea do estado do Rio de Janeiro. Aplicado o Modelo de Calgary de avaliação de famílias. Resultados: através do genograma e ecomapa identificou-se a organização familiar, as relações familiares e as várias situações de violência vivenciadas pela criança e seus familiares. Conclusão: este estudo ratifica o papel da enfermagem na identificação de casos de violência, a importância destes profissionais em compreender a magnitude desta situação e seus desdobramentos no ambiente familiar. O enfermeiro deve desenvolver habilidades que protejam a criança e sua família em questões de violência intrafamiliar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".