Quality control and removal of technical variation of NMR metabolic biomarker data in ∼120,000 UK Biobank participants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Metabolic biomarker data quantified by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy has recently become available in UK Biobank. Here, we describe procedures for quality control and removal of technical variation for this biomarker data, comprising 249 circulating metabolites, lipids, and lipoprotein sub-fractions on approximately 121,000 participants. We identify and characterise technical and biological factors associated with individual biomarkers and find that linear effects on individual biomarkers can combine in a non-linear fashion for 61 composite biomarkers and 81 biomarker ratios. We create an R package, ukbnmr, for extracting and normalising the metabolic biomarker data, then use ukbnmr to remove unwanted variation from the UK Biobank data. We make available code for re-deriving the 61 composite biomarkers and 81 ratios, and for further derivation of 76 additional biomarker ratios of potential biological significance. Finally, we demonstrate that removal of technical variation leads to increased signal for genetic and epidemiological studies of the NMR metabolic biomarkers in UK Biobank.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".