Accumulated and transient exergy analyses of pneumatic systems with isochoric and isobaric compressed air storage tanks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Low energy efficiency is one of the most significant shortcomings of industrial pneumatic systems. The isobaric air storage tank is a new concept for improving the energy efficiency of pneumatic systems. In this study, comprehensive accumulated and transient exergy analyses are conducted to provide insight into the energy‐saving mechanism of isobaric air storage tanks. The results show that the system exergy efficiency can be improved by replacing the isochoric tank with an isobaric one. There is negligible exergy destruction in both storage tanks. However, the storage tank can bring about significant influences on other components. The isobaric tank can effectively improve the exergy efficiencies of the compressor, cooler, and regulator. Besides, there is a huge potential to improve system exergy efficiency by taking advantage of the wasted exergy from the pneumatic cylinder.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it