Multi-axis Attentive Prediction for Sparse EventData: An Application to Crime Prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spatiotemporal prediction of event data is a challenging task with a long history of research. While recent work in spatiotemporal prediction has leveraged deep sequential models that substantially improve over classical approaches, these models are prone to overfitting when the observation is extremely sparse, as in the task of crime event prediction. To overcome these sparsity issues, we present Multi-axis Attentive Prediction for Sparse Event Data (MAPSED). We propose a purely attentional approach to extract both short-term dynamics and long-term semantics of event propagation through two observation angles. Unlike existing temporal prediction models that propagate latent information primarily along the temporal dimension, the MAPSED simultaneously operates over all axes (time, 2D space, event type) of the embedded data tensor. We additionally introduce a novel Frobenius norm-based contrastive learning objective to improve latent representational generalization.Empirically, we validate MAPSED on two publicly accessible urban crime datasets for spatiotemporal sparse event prediction, where MAPSED outperforms both classical and state-of-the-art deep learning models. The proposed contrastive learning objective significantly enhances the MAPSED's ability to capture the semantics and dynamics of the events, resulting in better generalization ability to combat sparse observations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".