MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3202957722

Canadian grid code for wind development : review and recommendations

2006· article· en· W3202957722 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWind powerGrid codeGridInterconnectionElectricityScale (ratio)TelecommunicationsElectric power transmissionComputer scienceMeteorologyEngineeringBusinessGeographyElectrical engineeringCartography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian Wind Energy Association (CanWEA) has launched an initiative to design the interconnection of utility-scale wind farms to provincial electricity transmission grids. Currently, Canadian provinces operate mostly in isolation along their own time frames to develop interconnection requirements for wind turbines and wind farms. This can lead to different sets of requirements and rules, particularly at the transmission level of 69 kV and higher. CanWEA hired Garrad Hassan Canada Inc. (GH) to study and resolve the issue. GH recommended that CanWEA adopt its proposed baseline Canadian Wind Interconnection Grid Code as a starting point to harmonize the various requirements in each province. The proposed code incorporates existing codes developed in Alberta, Ontario, Quebec and through the American Wind Energy Association. refs., tabs., figs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it