MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3202969757 · doi:10.1002/mde.3465

Start‐ups and entrepreneurial teams

2021· article· en· W3202969757 on OpenAlexaff
Hong Yang, Brian Paul Cozzarin, Peng Can, Chun Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueManagerial and Decision Economics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersGraduate Research and Innovation Projects of Jiangsu ProvinceChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsSocial capitalVenture capitalSocial venture capitalBusinessPerceptionEconomic capitalIndividual capitalCapital (architecture)New VenturesMarketingFinanceEntrepreneurshipEconomicsEconomic growthPsychologySociologyHuman capitalSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We survey 398 Chinese entrepreneurs within 118 entrepreneurial teams to investigate external social capital's impact on: the decision to start a venture and the mediating role that risk perception plays in that decision. Our results confirm that external social capital has a significant and positive effect on the decision to start a venture, while risk perception partly mediates this relationship. Furthermore, we find that the three dimensions of external social capital drive the decision to start a venture differently. The most important domains of external social capital are commercial social capital, followed by technical social capital and institutional social capital.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.805
Threshold uncertainty score0.620

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManagerial and Decision EconomicsSame topicEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207