Proyecciones estratégicas en bibliotecas públicas: ¿qué, cómo y para qué?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Public libraries contribute to free and open access to information, promote inclusion and social cohesion in an info‐diverse and multicultural space, stimulate lifelong learning, encourage citizen participation, and support empowerment and development of communities. Public libraries guide these actions in accordance with the goals and objectives that make up their strategies and projections. Public library performance in Canada, Chile, Colombia, Croatia, Denmark, Slovenia, Spain, the United States, Hong Kong, England, Lithuania, Norway, Poland and the United Kingdom are examined. In addition, the strategic projections of public libraries are analyzed in some of these contexts, and the convergence between its functions, goals, objectives and actions that they pursue for the benefit of the communities are noticed. Those goals are achieved, from the documental and content analysis of the strategic documents and the scientific production related to the actions of these public libraries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it