MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3202983345 · doi:10.5853/jos.2021.01312

A Bayesian Framework to Optimize Performance of Pre-Hospital Stroke Triage Scales

2021· article· en· W3202983345 on OpenAlexafffund
Mayank Goyal, Johanna M. Ospel, Beom Joon Kim, Nima Kashani, Martijne H.C. Duvekot, Bob Roozenbeek, Aravind Ganesh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Stroke · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta InnovatesFreiwillige Akademische GesellschaftCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyUniversity of CalgaryWellcome TrustWellcome
KeywordsTriageMedicineThrombolysisStroke (engine)Acute strokeMedical emergencyEmergency medicineEmergency departmentNursingMyocardial infarctionInternal medicineEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early identification of patients with stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO), potentially eligible for thrombolysis and endovascular therapy.(EVT), is important for patient triage and management 1,2 -such as deciding whether to directly transport a given patient to an EVT-capable comprehensive stroke center.(CSC).Various pre-hospital triage tools for acute stroke have been developed for this purpose.Clinical evaluation scales are most commonly used, as they can be adopted by paramedics after some basic training and require no specialized equipment.3 Below, using simulated data for the USA, we examine the strengths and weaknesses of current pre-hospital triage tools through a Bayesian lens, and discuss areas where our efforts should be directed to improve acute stroke triage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of StrokeSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207