MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3202983533 · doi:10.1145/3471988.3471991

DogMate: Dog Breeding, Grooming, Health and Vet Locator Information System for Dog Parents

2021· article· en· W3202983533 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mary Jane C. Samonte, Shaira Mae B. Isada, Prince Christian H. Ronquillo, Kristhan B. Tingal

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHuman-Animal Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDomesticationBreedAbandonment (legal)NeglectThe InternetCanisInternet privacyPsychologyComputer scienceWorld Wide WebBiologyPsychiatryEcologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dogs are the earliest animal to be domesticated and accompany man in his journey through history. Despite the massive differences between breeds like the Newfoundland and Pugs and Chihuahuas they are still members of the same species — Canis familiaris. However, with many breeds comes the problem of distinction and generalization and applying general knowledge on a dog can be difficult. Dog parents not understanding that caring for a dog is not as simple as just setting down a food bowl with treats or walking them for thirty (30) minutes a day often led to cases of neglect and abandonment. Knowing about the basics of a breed is the key to ensuring that the dog thrives in a household. Dog parents need information and, although much of it is accessible through the internet, not all of it can be found in just one website or one application. Using similar technology and a wider range of research, the developed website and mobile application, DogMate, showcases all three hundred forty-four (344) breeds, including general information on health and hygiene online and offline in place of needing to search of the same information through different websites online.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1150.066

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesFrench-language works237,207