MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

‘Staying at Home’ or ‘Choosing to Work’

2020· book-chapter· en· W3203027668 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patricia Hamilton

Bibliographic record

VenuePolicy Press eBooks · 2020
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLabor Movements and Unions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkforceWork (physics)Balance (ability)NarrativeOrder (exchange)Variety (cybernetics)Gender studiesRaising (metalworking)ColonialismSociologyPolitical scienceEngineeringPsychologyBusinessLawArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter focuses on the effort to balance work and family as one of the defining features of contemporary parenthood. It discusses the conflict between staying at home or working outside for women, which has been captured in the prevailing mommy wars discourse. It also explores the discourse about women's recent entrance into the paid workforce, which has revealed a variety of unresolved obstacles that must be overcome in order for women to meet both the economic responsibilities as good citizens and the requirements of raising good citizens. The chapter recounts how black women have been socially positioned as workers and forced to balance work and motherhood for generations, from slavery through colonialism and into the postwar period. It focuses on the narratives of two black mothers living in Canada, where one chooses to stay at home while the other opts to return to work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolicy Press eBooksSame topicLabor Movements and UnionsFrench-language works237,207