Theory of the dynamic medium of reference: Exterior case and interior case
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The theory of the dynamic medium of reference (DMR) has already been presented in several articles by this author [O. Pignard, Phys. Essays 32, 422 (2019); 33, 395 (2020); 34, 61 (2021)], and in particular, in the first one titled “Dynamic medium of reference: A new theory of gravitation.” This theory proposes the existence of a medium made up of entities called gravitons. A gravitational field is a flux of the medium, whose speed is defined by the formula C G / R → ( M ) = ∑ i = 1 N G V G / R → N G = V flux → ( M ) , where V G / R → is the speed of the gravitons with regard to the reference frame R and NG is the number of gravitons contained in an elementary volume centered in M. A massive body of mass M creates a flux of the medium of acceleration γ flux → = − ( GM / r 2 ) u r → and speed V flux → = − ( 2 G M / r ) u r → , both centripetal. While the relationship between the acceleration and the speed of the flux of the medium has already been demonstrated, the formula of the acceleration has not yet been demonstrated. This article proposes to provide the demonstration of the formula of acceleration in the exterior case (point M outside the massive body creating the gravitational field) and in the interior case (point M inside the massive body creating the gravitational field). It is then given the link between the theory of the DMR and general relativity in the exterior case and the interior case. Finally, the article presents reflections between the two theories and then gives arguments in favor of a propagation speed of the gravitational field much greater than that of light, noting that the theory of the DMR establishes a difference between the gravitational fields, which propagate at the speed of the gravitons and gravitational waves, which propagate at the speed of light.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".