El concepto jurisprudencial de acomodamiento razonable
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este articulo versa sobre el concepto jurisprudencial de acomodamiento razonable, presentando de un modo novedoso un tema apenas tratado en la doctrina espanola. Analiza la creacion de dicha nocion en la Jurisprudencia de Tribunal Supremo de Canada y su timida introduccion reciente en el Tribunal Europeo de derechos Humanos, en el que algunos jueces han hecho una referencia explicita a dicha tecnica y abogan por su utilizacion. La obligacion de acomodar o ajustar es el deber que, en virtud del derecho, incumbe a los gestores de instituciones y de organizaciones publicas y privadas de evitar cualquier forma de discriminacion indirecta tanto de las minorias como de las mayorias, tomando distintas medias de armonizacion en la aplicacion de ciertas leyes o de ciertos reglamentos, flexibilizando la norma o adaptandola en su aplicacion. Ello permite una mas justa gestion de la diversidad cultural y religiosa en el espacio publico, conforme al modelointercultural liderado por el Consejo de Europa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it