MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3203134209 · doi:10.18280/rcma.310402

Delamination Analysis of Composite Sandwich Plate of Cork Agglomerate/Glass Fiber-Polyester: An Experimental Investigation

2021· article· fr· W3203134209 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des composites et des matériaux avancés · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Analysis of Composite Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorkAgglomerateComposite materialMaterials scienceComposite numberPolyesterDelamination (geology)Glass fiberFiber

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an experimental investigation of damage in sandwich structures. These sandwich panels are result of the combination of glass-polyester as skins and cork agglomerate as core. For this purpose, delamination test (mode I) is carried on double cantilever beams (DCB) in sandwich beams. The initiation crack is characterized by toughness obtained from the determination of energy release rate (GIC) by modified beam theory method. The skins of these sandwiches are considered as orthotropic materials while the core as isotropic transverse material. The results show that, the energy release rate at the initiation of the crack of (DCB) specimens remains almost constant despite the variation of the initial crack, a good adhesion (skins -core) is also noticed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it