Algebraic Connectivity: Local and Global Maximizer Graphs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Algebraic connectivity is one way to quantify graph connectivity, which in turn gauges robustness as a network. In this paper, we consider the problem of maximizing algebraic connectivity both locally and globally overall simple, undirected, unweighted graphs with a given number of vertices and edges. We pursue this optimization by equivalently minimizing the largest eigenvalue of the Laplacian of the ‘complement graph’. We establish that the union of complete subgraphs are largest eigenvaluelocalminimizer graphs. Further, under sufficient conditions satisfied by the edge/vertex counts, we prove that this union of complete components graphs are, in fact, Laplacian largest eigenvalueglobalmaximizers; these results generalize the ones in the literature that are for just two components. These sufficient conditions can be viewed as quantifying situations where the component sizes are either ‘quite homogeneous’ or some of them are relatively ‘negligibly small,’ and thus generalize known results of homogeneity of components. While a conjecture about global optimality of complete bipartite graphs' from the literature continues to remain open, assuming appropriate constraints we prove the conjecture and also formulate/prove a variant of this claim. We finally relate this central optimization problem in this paper with the Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) and circulant graphs/matrices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".