SmithNet: Strictness on Motion-Texture Coherence for Anomaly Detection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anomaly detection is a key functionality in various vision systems, such as surveillance and security. In this work, we present a convolutional neural network (CNN) that supports the detection of anomaly, which has not been defined when building the model, at frame level. Our CNN, named SmithNet, is structured to simultaneously learn commonly occurring textures and their corresponding motion. Its architecture is a combination of: 1) an encoder extracting motion-texture coherence from each video frame and 2) two decoders that separately reconstruct the input as well as predict its typical motion from the estimated coherence. We also introduce an encoding block, which is specifically designed for the task of anomaly detection. The optimization is performed on only data of normal events, and the network is expected to determine the ones that are unusual, i.e., have not been seen before. According to the experiments on eight benchmark datasets of different environments with various anomalous events, the performance of our network is competitive or outperforms current state-of-the-art approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it