IMPROVING THE DESIGN OF THERMAL TOOLS FOR ROCK FRACTURING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article deals with the main parameters of the thermodynamic working device for rock destruction due to the implementation of a new method of fuel mixture combustion in shock waves initiated by a high-speed torch burner in gas-dynamic combustion intensifiers. A device for thermal destruction of rocks has been developed, which belongs to the mining industry and can be used for directed impact on rocks when they are destroyed by hot gas jets in mining, stone processing and construction industries. Also, installed coaxial to the nozzle, with increasing inside diameter, a cylindrical nozzle, with two cascades of ejection holes - the first cascade is made at a distance from the Laval nozzle, equal to the distance to complete expansion of the jet of the torch, then, the accelerating section of the nozzle and the new, formed by burning the unburned fuel, jet of the burner. It is found that the cross sectional area of the inner hole of the cylindrical nozzle, is made with an excess of the area of the critical cross section of the nozzle Laval burner 2.5-3 times, in which, because of the rapid expansion of the gas flow in the nozzle, there is turbulization, with the formation of a powerful zone of heating of the gas flow and the appearance of a standing detonation wave in it. The drilling angle of the ejection holes of the first stage is 45-50º to the axis of the nozzle, which serves for ejection of atmospheric air, the oxygen of which reacts with the surplus of combustible in the main jet of the burner and the formation of a more powerful jet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".