MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3203246719 · doi:10.1021/acsanm.1c01974

Solvent-Exfoliated Hexagonal Boron Nitride Nanoflakes for Quantum Emitters

2021· article· en· W3203246719 on OpenAlexaff
Yongliang Chen, Mika T. Westerhausen, Chi Li, Simon White, Carlo Bradac, Avi Bendavid, Milos Toth, Igor Aharonovich, Toan Trong Tran

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Nano Materials · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphene research and applications
Canadian institutionsTrent University
FundersAustralian Research Council
KeywordsExfoliation jointMaterials scienceNanotechnologyHexagonal boron nitrideFabricationSolventImpurityHexagonal crystal systemBoron nitrideQuantum yieldChemical engineeringOptoelectronicsGrapheneChemistryCrystallographyOrganic chemistryOpticsPhysicsFluorescence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) flakes have recently emerged as a promising platform for nanophotonic and quantum applications. The solvent-exfoliation process of these flakes has, however, remained largely unexplored. In this work, we demonstrate a surfactant-assisted exfoliation technique in an aqueous solution to exfoliate a variety of commercially available hBN powders into hBN nanoflakes. We show that the selection of hBN powder greatly impacts the optical properties of the resultant quantum emitters embedded in exfoliated hBN nanoflakes. We find that the sample with the best optical performance also shows the lowest impurity levels in its starting hBN powder. Our study provides further insight into quantum emitter fabrication in hBN and tailoring of their optical properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Nano MaterialsSame topicGraphene research and applicationsFrench-language works237,207