MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3203258711 · doi:10.1016/j.envc.2021.100299

Statistical downscaling of global circulation models to assess future climate changes in the Black Volta basin of Ghana

2021· article· en· W3203258711 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ebenezer K. Siabi, Amos T. Kabo-Bah, Komlavi Akpoti, Geophery K. Anornu, Mark Amo-Boateng, Emmanuel Kwesi Nyantakyi

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Challenges · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDownscalingCirculation (fluid dynamics)Structural basinClimatologyGeneral Circulation ModelEnvironmental scienceClimate modelClimate changeGeographyGeologyOceanographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Statistical Downscaling Model (SDSM) is a powerful model for climate change assessment. However, its usage remains very gray with limited studies on climate change (CC) assessment in Ghana. This study explored the applicability and suitability of SDSM for CC assessment in the Black Volta section of Ghana. The hydro-climatic parameters of Hadley center Coupled Model, version 3 (HadCM3) under the A2 and B2 Emissions Scenarios and the second-generation Canadian Earth System Model (CanESM2) under the Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) 2.6, 4.5 and 8.5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 were downscaled with SDSM over the Black Volta section in Ghana using 40-year ground station data. The R 2 , NSE, Pbias, RMSE, and KGE of the calibrated and validated results ranged from 64% to 99%, 50–99%, -0.30–21.1, 0.01 °C–1.48 °C and 49%–99%, respectively for both models indicating a good agreement between the historical and the simulated data. The future climate change showed an increase in average minimum temperature of 0.05 °C (2020s), 0.11 °C (2050s), 0.21 °C (2080s) under the A2 scenario, 0.05 °C (2020s), 0.13 °C (2050s), 0.19 °C (2080s) under the B2 scenario, 0.01 °C (2020s), 0.02 °C (2050s), 0.02 °C (2080s) under the RCP 2.6, 0.06 °C (2020s), 0.13 °C (2050s), 0.19 °C (2080s) under the RCP 4.5, and 0.06 °C (2020s), 0.15 °C (2050s), 0.32 °C (2080s) under the RCP 8.5. For Maximum temperature, the average changes showed an increase of 0.17 °C (2020s), 0.36 °C (2050s), 1.14 °C (2080s) under the A2 scenario, 0.18 °C (2020s), 0.39 °C (2050s), 1.01 °C (2080s) under the B2 scenario, 0.03 °C (2020s), 0.16 °C (2050s), 0.17 °C (2080s) under the RCP 2.6, 0.02 °C (2020s), 0.26 °C (2050s), 0.45 °C (2080s) under the RCP 4.5, and 0.03 °C (2020s), 0.29 °C (2050s), 0.61 °C (2080s) under the RCP 8.5. The change in precipitation is not uniform with increase and decrease depending on the months and the scenarios. Overall, A2, B2 scenarios showed higher decrease in precipitation compared to RCPs scenarios. The SDSM is suitable for CC assessment and impact studies. The results from this study are to support the Climate Action, goal 13 of the SDGs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental ChallengesSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207