MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

1330 The Effects of SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19) on NICU health care providers

2021· article· en· W3203323336 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Canadian institutionsChildren's & Women's Health Centre of British ColumbiaB.C. Women's Hospital & Health CentreWomen's Health Research InstituteUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersonal protective equipmentSocial distancePandemicIsolation (microbiology)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Health careNursingBurnoutMedicineWork (physics)Family medicinePsychologyDiseasePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> The Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) has risks of burnout and psychological morbidity for health care providers. The COVID-19 pandemic has required the rapid adaptation of work practices to accommodate social distancing and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) policy changes. Many departments have recognized the wellbeing implications to staff and made changes to try and mitigate this risk. <h3>Objectives</h3> In this study, we aim to begin to understand how COVID-19 and its associated workplace practice changes have impacted the existing situation. <h3>Methods</h3> An online survey was distributed to tertiary NICU physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners, respiratory therapists and allied health professionals in British Columbia and Alberta (table 1). We employed a combination of closed- and open-ended questions to understand the participants’ views on work in the NICU during the pandemic and how this has impacted their wellbeing. <h3>Results</h3> 142 replies of which 121 were complete. 93 were from Alberta, 45 from British Columbia, and 4 did not provide their province. Of the respondents, 33 (22.7%) had cared for a patient with COVID-19. 98.3% reported a major change as a result of COVID-19. These included homeschooling children (40, 33.3%), caring for vulnerable relatives (19, 15.8%), shielding vulnerable relatives (107, 89.2%), changes to a family member’s employment (36, 30%) and being unable to connect with friends and family outside their city/province (101, 84.2%) Respondents also cited themes of personal isolation, delayed care for their or their family’s non-COVID-19 physical and mental health conditions, anxiety at working on multiple sites and a lack of access to their usual daily coping strategies such as sports. There were a series of Likert-scale question, with 0 = ‘Completely disagree’ and 100 = ‘Completely agree’. <h3>Conclusions</h3> All NICUs have made significant adaptions to their operating procedures and sought to support their staff through the pandemic, and these data suggest that this is recognised by the majority of participants. This is necessary but not sufficient. The successes we can demonstrate in the logistical response must be taken in context of a global change affecting staff’s physical, psychological and social circumstances which changes their relationship with the NICU. In future work, we aim to use quantitative and qualitative analysis from this survey in order to better understand the current state of staff wellbeing, the nature of the difficulties experienced by staff and their perception of the interventions used to support them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.307
Threshold uncertainty score0.865

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it