Evolution of wake structures behind oscillating hydrofoils with combined heaving and pitching motion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The wake of an oscillating teardrop hydrofoil with combined heaving and pitching motion was studied numerically at Reynolds number of 8000 and Strouhal numbers of $St=0.21{-}0.94$ . The lower Strouhal number exhibited high efficiency propulsion with small thrust generation. However, larger thrust generation at high $St$ required more power, which lowered the propulsive efficiency. Quantitative assessment of vortex evolution, along with qualitative investigation of the formation and interaction of primary structures, revealed the association with elliptic instability characteristics for both co-rotating and counter-rotating vortex structures in both wakes. With respect to advection of the leading-edge vortex, the pressure distribution further depicted evidence of spanwise instability with distinct temporal evolution along the suction and pressure surfaces of the oscillating foil. Three-dimensional assessment of wake structures located downstream of the trailing edge depicted the existence of dislocations associated with primary vortex ‘rollers’. At low $St$ , these were limited to fine spanwise corrugations (valleys and bulges) on weaker leading edge rollers, which enlarged as the rollers advected downstream. In contrast, at high $St$ , the wake exhibited conjoint hairpin-horseshoe vortex structures that led to stronger deformations on the coupled vortex rollers. The statistical characteristics of secondary structures resembled the long wavelength mode and mode A identified previously for purely pitching and heaving foils, respectively. They also mimicked mode B for stationary cylinders. Novel wake models are introduced based on a complete vivid three-dimensional depiction of coherent wake structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".