A Numerical Study on the Interaction Between Different Position of Cellular Headsets and a Human Head
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper the interaction between a human head exposed to a bluetooth-based cellular headset in different positions is studied. The exposure to the electromagnetic fields is a concern when people use these devices. The interaction of human head and bluetooth mobile headsets has not been considered in related standards. In this research three installed positions for the headset and two scenarios for the user are defined. In the first scenario the user is in free space and in the second scenario the user is in a car. For both scenarios path loss, antenna gain, total isotropic sensitivity, and specific absorption rate values for three positions of the headset on the head are obtained. SEMCAD X software is used as an FDTD-based simulation platform for our numerical studies. The result of our study can help manufacturers to consider the compatibility of these devices with safety guidelines of electromagnetic exposure specified by relevant institutes. Designers of wireless devices can use results of this study to design new headsets that can be used in an appropriate position while the performance of the device is less affected by the human head and the environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it